Early Kienböck disease cannot be detected by radiography: Comment on the clinical image by Ko et al
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comment on study by Backman et al
BfArM acknowledges the submission of the manuscript by Backman et al. (2005) concerning the occurrence of breast cancer associated with Mirena use. The manuscript was scheduled for publication in October 2005 and meanwhile has been published (Backman T. et al. Use of the Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer. Obstet and Gynecol 2005;106:813-7). Unfortunately, the study ...
متن کاملComment on Article by Celeux Et Al
The authors point to several problems occurring if DIC = 2D(θ) − D(θ) is applied to missing data models: (i) the focus of the model depends on whether the missing data z are considered as observations or as parameters or integrated out; (ii) the parameter θ may be non-identifiable; (iii) θ can be a poor estimator of θ. They then investigate modifications of DIC mainly based on estimates other t...
متن کاملResponse to comment by Moxon et al.
We would like to thank Clinical Science for the opportunity to respond to the letter [1] which suggests that while we have been able to show that PTP1B inhibitor, trodusquemine, decreases atherosclerotic plaque size as well as serum triglycerides and cholesterol, that we have not shown that it reverses the plaque size, using in vivo imaging techniques such as MRI scanning or ultrasound. Both Ld...
متن کاملComment on the correspondence by Cokol et al.
The correspondence by Cokol et al (2007) confirms a previous finding that some journals with a high impact factor (IF) publish more retractions than those with a low IF (Liu, 2006f). Their explanation is that high-IF journals receive more scrutiny from the scientific community, and that therefore more publications are identified as flawed and subsequently retracted. Equally, they argue, low-IF ...
متن کاملReply to Comment by Young et al.
Had our study been, as Young et al. imply, a data trawling exercise using hundreds of variables to look for a 'thread', then doubts about its validity might be justified. However, their account of our work bears little relationship to the methods, results or conclusions we report. For example, Young et al. claim that we used 396 tests to address our primary hypothesis. In fact, we used two. You...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Arthritis & Rheumatism
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0004-3591,1529-0131
DOI: 10.1002/art.27341